Across r computervision and others, builders debate whether Claude can replace CV pipelines, with a recurring view that LLMs help most with task decomposition, model selection, and pipeline logic rather than core perception.
Everyone's wondering if LLMs are going to replace CV workflows. I tested Claude Opus 4.6 on a real segmentation task.
My takeaway: LLMs aren't coming for CV engineers' jobs, they're coming for the reasoning part of the workflow. The model selection, the pipeline logic, the task decomposition.
You should try asking it to specially use SAM.
This finding is one of many signals tracked across Artificial Intelligence. The live feed updates every few hours with new expert voices, debates, and emerging ideas.
← Back to Artificial Intelligence