Josh Farkas argues pupillometry studies reporting only the neural pupil index are scientifically weak because the metric is proprietary and computed via a secret formula from a single vendor.
Research on pupillometry that only reports the neural pupil index (NPi) is worthless
NPi is *proprietary* & calculated with a *secret* formula by *one* company's product.
Does this seem like ideal scientific practice?
This finding is one of many signals tracked across Healthcare. The live feed updates every few hours with new expert voices, debates, and emerging ideas.
β Back to Healthcare