In r/AskNetsec, practitioners struggle to translate more scans and tools into leadership-friendly evidence of reduced risk. The discussion pushes toward business-case framing and metrics tied to actively exploited vulnerabilities and remediation timeliness.
Security budget went up 18% this year.
leadership is asking “are we actually more secure than last year?” and I don’t have a clean answer.
We can show number of scans, number of findings and number of tickets but none of that translates to actual risk reduction.
We don’t have metrics for exposure to actively exploited vulns, how long critical issues stay open
Why did you get more tools? What was the business case?
This finding is one of many signals tracked across Cyber Security. The live feed updates every few hours with new expert voices, debates, and emerging ideas.
← Back to Cyber Security